Health Outcomes Research in Medicine
Volume 1, Issue 1 , Pages e39-e49, July 2010

Readability and Missing Data Rates in CAHPS 2.0 Medicare Survey in African American and White Medicare Respondents

  • Marie Ngetiko Fongwa, RN, MPH, PhD

      Affiliations

    • School of Nursing, Azusa Pacific University, Azusa, California
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding Address: Marie Ngetiko Fongwa, RN, MPH, PhD, School of Nursing, Azusa Pacific University, 701 East Foothill Boulevard, PO Box 7000, Azusa,  CA 91702.
  • ,
  • Claude M. Setodji, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Rand Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • ,
  • Sylvia H. Paz, PhD

      Affiliations

    • School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
  • ,
  • Leo S. Morales, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
  • ,
  • W.N. Steers, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
  • ,
  • Ron D. Hays, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California

published online 17 May 2010.

Abstract 

Purpose

To examine associations between readability of survey items and missing data rates in a sample of white and African-American Medicare enrollees in managed care plans.

Methods

Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Provider and Systems (CAHPS) 2.0 health plan survey data collected from 139,284 respondents (127,524 whites and 11,760 African Americans) in 321 health plans. Product-moment correlations were computed between Flesch-Kincaid (F-K) readability estimates and the CAHPS item-missing data rates.

Results

F-K reading levels for items ranged from 4.8 to 17.7 with a mean of 8.9 across items. Missing data rates ranged from 1% to 10%, with African Americans having significantly higher missing data rates. Correlations between missing data rates and item-level readability were statistically significant for whites (r=0.33, P=.0515) and African Americans (r=0.37, P=.0284).

Conclusions

The significant associations between missing data rates and item-level readability estimates indicate that the completion of survey items varies by their readability. Enhancing the readability of survey items can improve the inclusion of survey data collected from different respondents.

Keywords: African Americans, CAHPS survey, Flesch-Kincaid readability estimates, Medicare enrollees

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was supported in part by grant number 5 U18 HS-00924 and 1 U18 HS-016980 from AHRQ, the UCLA/Drew Project EXPORT, NIH, National Center on Minority Health & Health Disparities, (P20-MD00148-01) and the UCLA Center for Health Improvement in Minority Elders/Resource Centers for Minority Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Aging, NIH/NIA/NCMHD, under Grant P30-AG-021684. The authors also acknowledge the assistance with access to data provided by the CMS and staff affiliated with the CAHPS Database effort. Hays was also supported in part by AG20679-01 from the National Institute of Aging and the UCLA Older Americans Independence Center, NIH/NIA Grant P30-AG028748.

 None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to disclose.

PII: S1877-1319(10)00003-0

doi:10.1016/j.ehrm.2010.03.001

Health Outcomes Research in Medicine
Volume 1, Issue 1 , Pages e39-e49, July 2010