The Effect of the Vermont Diabetes Information System on Inpatient and Emergency Department Use: Results from a Randomized Trial
Abstract
Objective
To describe the effect of the Vermont Diabetes Information System (VDIS) on hospital and emergency department use.
Data Source
Statewide discharge database.
Study Design
Randomized controlled trial of a decision support system for 7412 adults with diabetes and their 64 primary care providers.
Data Collection/Data Extraction
Charges and dates for hospital admissions and emergency department care in Vermont during an average of 32 months of observation. Data from New York hospitals were not available.
Results
Patients randomized to VDIS were admitted to the hospital less often than control subjects (0.17 admissions vs 0.20; P
=
.01) and generated lower hospital charges ($3113 vs $3480; P
=
.019). VDIS patients also had lower emergency department utilization (0.27 visits vs 0.36; P <.0001) and charges ($304 vs $414; P <.0001). The intervention was particularly effective in men and in older subjects.
Conclusions
Despite data limitations that tended to reduce the apparent effect of the system, this randomized, controlled trial showed that VDIS reduces hospitalization and emergency department utilization and expenses.
Keywords: Chronic disease, Clinical, Cost of care, Decision support systems, Diabetes mellitus, Emergency department use, Health services research, Hospitalization, Patient care management, Primary health care
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01 DK61167 and K24 DK068380).
Conflict of interest: Drs. MacLean and Littenberg, along with the University of Vermont, hold equity in Vermedx, Inc., which distributes the Vermedx® Diabetes Information System, which is based on the work described in this manuscript. The authors comply with all conflict of interest policies of the National Institutes of Health and of the University of Vermont.
PII: S1877-1319(10)00006-6
doi:10.1016/j.ehrm.2010.03.002
© 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
